New
Service for TodaysSeniorsNetwork.com
readers...roll mouse over, click on
highlighted links in stories to review items
from Amazon
Now, keep up to date
with daily feeds of newly posted stories
about America's Seniors...click on the box
to the left
Combination therapy
improves survival time from Advanced Liver
Cancer
Newswise — Combining a
type of chemotherapy with radiothermal
therapy resulted in longer survival time for
patients with advanced liver cancer,
compared to receiving the therapies alone,
according to a study in the April 9 issue of
JAMA.
The incidence of liver
cancer is increasing worldwide. Most liver
cancers are diagnosed at intermediate or
advanced stages, and until now, no standard
therapy has been established for treatment
of liver cancer, according to background
information in the article.
The therapy called
transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE)
slows tumor progression and improves
survival by combining the effect of targeted
chemotherapy with that of blocking the blood
supply to the tumor. Radiofrequency thermal
ablation (RFA) is an emerging technology
that typically is performed by advancing a
specially designed probe into the tumor and
applying radiofrequency energy.
However,
both TACE and RFA have limitations, with
neither resulting in adequate control of
liver cancer tumors larger than 3 cm (1.2
inches). TACE combined with RFA therapy has
been used for patients with large liver
cancer tumors, but the survival benefits are
not known.
Bao-Quan Cheng, M.D., Ph.D., and colleagues
from Shandong University, Jinan, China,
conducted a randomized controlled trial to
assess the long-term benefits of combining
TACE and RFA therapies for liver cancer
tumors larger than 3 cm.
The trial was
conducted from January 2001 to May 2004 and
included 291 patients at a single center in
China. Patients were randomly assigned to
treatment with combined TACE-RFA (n = 96),
TACE alone (n = 95), or RFA alone (n = 100).
At the end of
follow-up, 80 patients in the TACE group (84
percent), 84 in the RFA group (84 percent),
and 66 in the TACE-RFA group (69 percent)
had died. The lower rate of death in the
TACE-RFA group was the result of fewer
deaths due to tumor progression in this
group than in the TACE group or the RFA
group.
Median (midpoint) survival times were
24 months in the TACE group, 22 months in
the RFA group, and 37 months in TACE-RFA
group. Survival rates were significantly
better in the TACE-RFA group than in the
TACE or RFA group.
For patients with a
type of liver cancer known as uninodular or
multinodular, overall survival was
statistically significantly better in the
TACE-RFA group than in the RFA group, and
TACE group, respectively.
Thirty-three patients
(35 percent) achieved an objective response
to treatment that was sustained for at least
six months in the TACE group, 36 (36
percent) in the RFA group, and 52 (54
percent) in the TACE-RFA group.
“The current study
demonstrates that combination therapy with
TACE and RFA was an effective and safe
treatment that may improve long-term
survival for patients with hepatocellular
carcinoma [liver cancer] larger than 3 cm,”
the authors conclude.
Editor’s Note: Please see the article for
additional information, including other
authors, author contributions and
affiliations, financial disclosures, funding
and support, etc.
Editorial: Expanding
the Treatment Options for Hepatocellular
Carcinoma
In an accompanying
editorial, Andrew X. Zhu, M.D., Ph.D., of
the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer
Center, and Harvard Medical School, Boston,
and Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, M.D., of Memorial
Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York,
write that these findings are promising.
“The study by Cheng et
al provides initial evidence to support the
use of TACE-RFA as a new treatment option in
highly selected patients with unresectable
[unable to be removed by surgery]
hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC]. … However,
despite the positive findings in this study,
the exact role for TACE-RFA in the treatment
of patients with unresectable HCC remains a
controversial and unresolved issue, similar
to the situation for many of the
interventional-based therapies.”
...
...
...