Learning
information the hard way may be best 'boot
camp' for older brains
Making mistakes while learning has memory
benefits
September 1, 2011 – Canadian researchers
have found the first evidence that older
brains get more benefit than younger brains
from learning information the hard way – via
trial-and-error learning.
The study was led by scientists at
Baycrest's world-renowned Rotman Research
Institute in Toronto and appears online Aug.
24, 2011 in the journal Psychology and
Aging, ahead of the print edition.
The finding will surprise professional
educators and cognitive rehabilitation
clinicians as it challenges a large body of
published science which has shown that
making mistakes while learning information
hurts memory performance for older adults,
and that passive "errorless" learning (where
the correct answer is provided) is better
suited to older brains.
"The scientific literature has traditionally
embraced errorless learning for older
adults. However, our study has shown that if
older adults are learning material that is
very conceptual, where they can make a
meaningful relationship between their errors
and the correct information that they are
supposed to remember, in those cases the
errors can actually be quite beneficial for
the learning process," said Andreé-Ann Cyr,
the study's lead investigator.
Cyr conducted the research at Baycrest as a
doctoral student in Psychology (University
of Toronto), in collaboration with senior
author and scientist Dr. Nicole Anderson of
Baycrest's Rotman Research Institute. Dr.
Anderson specializes in cognitive
rehabilitation research with older adults.
In two separate studies, researchers
compared the memory benefits of
trial-and-error learning (TEL) with
errorless learning (EL) in memory exercises
with groups of healthy young and older
adults. The young adults were in their 20s;
the older adults' average age was 70. TEL is
considered a more effortful cognitive
encoding process where the brain has to
"scaffold" its way to making richer
associations and linkages in order to reach
the correct target information. Errorless
learning (EL) is considered passive, or less
taxing on the brain, because it provides the
correct answer to be remembered during the
learning process.
The researchers presented participants with
a meaningful "cue" (e.g. type of tooth). The
correct target word (e.g. molar) was shown
to learners in the EL condition. In the TEL
condition, the cue was presented alone, and
participants made two guesses (such as
canine, incisor) before the correct target
"molar" was shown. After a short while,
participants performed a memory test that
required them to remember the context in
which the words were learned (i.e. were they
learned through trial-and-error or not).
In both studies, participants remembered the
learning context of the target words better
if they had been learned through
trial-and-error, relative to the errorless
condition. This was especially true for the
older adults whose performance benefited
approximately 2.5 times more relative to
their younger peers.
The findings from the Baycrest study may
have important implications for how
information is taught to older adults in the
classroom, and for rehabilitation procedures
aimed at delaying cognitive decline –
procedures which rely on knowledge of how to
train an aging brain, said Cyr.
The authors say future studies are needed to
determine how different study materials and
memory tasks impact the effect of errors on
memory in aging. This will help to clarify
the learning contexts in which errors should
be avoided or harnessed.