New
Service for TodaysSeniorsNetwork.com
readers...roll mouse over, click on
highlighted links in stories to review items
from Amazon
Now, keep up to date
with daily feeds of newly posted stories
about America's Seniors...click on the box
to the left
New Year’s Resolution: Quit smoking? Move to
California
Newswise — Sun. Sand. Surf. And no smoking. California’s attitude
toward smoking may be the best recipe for
success when trying to quit. New research
shows that social pressure plays a key role
in getting smokers to quit.
By analyzing the smoking patterns of Asian immigrants from
countries where smoking is socially
acceptable, researchers at the University of
California, San Diego School of Medicine
have shown that smokers are far more likely
to try to quit when living where smoking is
not socially acceptable. And the more these
smokers try to quit, the more they succeed.
“People say they don’t want to conform but in reality, the desire
to conform is strong,” said principal
investigator Shu-Hong Zhu, Ph.D., of the
Cancer Prevention and Control Program at
Moores UCSD Cancer Center, and Department of
Family and Preventive Medicine at UCSD
School of Medicine.
“For a study like this, you have to create a different social norm
and then allow people to experience it, so
immigrants are an ideal group to study.”
Using data from three previous tobacco studies conducted in
California, Zhu’s team looked at smokers who
are recent immigrants to California from
China and Korea, where smoking is still
widely accepted.
They found that the California immigrants have a smoking cessation
rate much higher than their counterparts in
their native countries, where about two
thirds of all men smoke, and smoking is a
common and expected social interaction.
California provides a radically different
setting. The most recent data from the
Centers for Disease Control (CDC) shows that
only about 14 percent of California’s adults
smoke.
With a strong state tobacco control program
in place since 1989, most Californians see
smoking as socially unacceptable.
Smoking has been banned in restaurants and
bars statewide for nearly a decade, and more
than half the Californians who have ever
smoked have now successfully quit, one of
the highest quit rates in the nation.
The Numbers
In their study, published in Nicotine and Tobacco Research
(November 2007: Volume 9, Supplement 3)
researchers note that more than half of all
Chinese and Korean immigrants in California
who ever smoked have quit. Chinese immigrant
smokers in California stop smoking at
roughly seven times the rate of their
counterparts in China.
In Korea, a recent, aggressive tobacco control campaign is
starting to boost the quit rate, but Korean
immigrants in California still stop smoking
at more than three times the rate of their
counterparts in Korea.
Anti-smoking Campaigns Work
The researchers attribute this marked difference to the difference
in social norms. According to the UC San
Diego study, over 82 percent of Chinese and
Korean immigrant smokers in California
reported that they were familiar with the
state’s anti-smoking campaigns through
print, television, or radio. This
familiarity shows an awareness of the new
social norm.
Changing the social norm not only makes more smokers try to quit,
it also makes them more likely to keep on
trying, even if earlier tries ended in
relapse. Repeated tries will ultimately lead
to success.
Zhu points out, “The large difference in annual quit rates is
almost completely explained by the
difference in proportions of smokers trying
to quit. In China, for example, the quit
rate is low because a very low proportion of
smokers try to quit each year. In
California, by contrast, a very high
proportion of Chinese smokers try to quit
each year. More tries means more success.
Cessation aids like nicotine patches, gum,
and so on, contribute only in a minor way to
these smokers' dramatically higher quit rate
because few of these immigrants use them.”
What does the UCSD study mean for tobacco control? Social norm
change is more powerful than people may have
realized, said Zhu.
Passing new laws and
mounting media campaigns is not only a cost
effective plan, but will also have dramatic,
population-wide impact, the report
concludes.
The study, supported by the National Cancer Institute, was
conducted by a team of California healthcare
professionals, including: lead investigator
Shu-Hong Zhu, Ph.D., UCSD; research fellow
Shiushing Wong, Ph.D., UCSD; Chih-Wen Shi,
M.D. assistant adjunct professor, Department
of Family and Preventive Medicine, UCSD; Hao
Tang, M.D., Ph.D., California Department of
Health Services; and Moon Chen, Ph.D., M.P.H,
University of California, Davis.
The Data
Data for the study came from three tobacco surveys conducted in
California. Two focused specifically on
Asian populations:
The 2003 California Chinese American Tobacco
Use Survey (Carr et al., 2005a) and
The 2003 California Korean American Tobacco
Use Survey (Carr et al., 2005b).
Both surveys recruited respondents by randomly telephoning numbers
from purchased lists of households with
Chinese and Korean surnames. A professional
survey research service, Strategic Research
Group, Inc. used a computer assisted
telephone interviewing (CATI) system and
trained telephone interviewers to screen
people at random from the telephone lists.
The third source of data for this present study was the 2002
California Tobacco Survey (CTS), a
population-based, random-digit-dialed survey
conducted in English and Spanish, every 3
years, for evaluation of the California
Tobacco Control Program (Gilpin et al.,
2003).