Blue Ribbon panel calls for
reform in long-term care, substantial Commitment of Federal
resources…Poll
shows Baby Boomers, Seniors concerned about paying for care
Washington, DC—A panel of experts from the National Academy
of Social Insurance (NASI) is calling for fundamental
reforms in financing long-term care, including a substantial
commitment of federal resources. A poll released today along
with the panel's report finds a high level of public concern
about paying for long-term care and widespread discontent
with the current system of financing.
“The
American public understands that the financing of long-term
care is a serious policy problem and seems receptive to
change,” said Judith Feder, study panel co-chair and Dean of
the Public Policy Institute at Georgetown University.
“According to our research, even those less concerned about
the problem are troubled that the current system
impoverishes people before it helps them.” The poll shows
that seven in ten baby boomers and seniors believe that the
government should do more to help people meet the cost of
long-term care.
“Members
of the panel feel strongly that a better long-term care
system is essential to enable all Americans, regardless of
age or disability, to participate fully in our society,”
said Sheila P. Burke, the panel's other co-chair and Deputy
Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution.
“The current
long-term care system falls far short of meeting reasonable
expectations. Achieving a system that meets individual needs
and distributes costs equitably will require greater federal
involvement and financing.”
Because
the need for long-term care is a risk, not a certainty, the
panel recommends that it should be handled through
insurance, like other unpredictable and potentially
catastrophic events. The study panel does not endorse one
particular solution but identifies two promising approaches.
One option, modeled on Social Security, would provide
universal access to a basic, limited long-term care benefit,
supplemented by private insurance for the better-off and
enhanced public protection for the low-income population.
Another option would establish a national floor of income
and asset protection that would reform or replace Medicaid's
coverage of long-term care.
These
findings come at a time when the baby boomers are
approaching retirement and interest in long-term care policy
is growing. Two bipartisan long-term proposals have recently
been introduced in the Senate: S.1602, sponsored by Senators
Grassley, Clinton, and Bayh, and S. 1951, offered by
Senators Kennedy and DeWine.
The
panel's conclusions, as well as the results of the poll, are
described in its final report,
Developing a Better Long-Term Care Policy: A Vision and
Strategy for America's Future, available for download
free-of-charge from the NASI website at www.nasi.org. More
information about the poll can be found in an accompanying
issue brief,
Long-Term Care: The Public's View. Another issue brief,
Long-Term Care: Models from Abroad, illustrates how
other countries have devised long-term care systems that
balance public financing with personal responsibility.
The
National Academy of Social Insurance is a nonprofit,
nonpartisan organization made up of the nation's leading
experts on social insurance. Its mission is to promote
understanding and informed policymaking on social insurance
and related programs through research, public education,
training, and the open exchange of ideas. The Robert Wood
Johnson Foundation provided the primary financial support
for this project. Other funders include the TIAA-CREF
Institute, the Service Employees International Union, GE
Financial Assurance, and the John D. and Catherine T.
MacArthur Foundation.