Now, keep up to date
with daily feeds of newly posted stories
about America's Seniors...click on the box
to the left
Older adults often excluded
from clinical trials
US population ages, need grows for research
to improve health and health care for
seniors
February 3, 2011--Older individuals, who
constitute a rapidly growing population in
the United States, account for a
disproportionate share of health care
utilization and cost.
Yet more than half of clinical trials exclude
people based on their age or age-related
conditions, according to a new study by
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF)
Clinical Scholars® at the University of
Michigan.
"These findings are concerning because it means
that doctors cannot be confident that
clinical trial results apply to their older
patients," says Donna Zulman, M.D., the
study's lead author and a Veterans Affairs
scholar with the RWJF Clinical Scholars
program at the University of Michigan Health
System.
"Health care providers and patients need better
evidence about treatment strategies that
improve the health and quality of life of
seniors."
As of 2009, Americans over the age of 65
represented 12.5 percent of the U.S.
population—about one in every eight
Americans—and by 2030, that number is
expected to almost double.
This population accounts for 34 percent of
personal health care expenditures, with the
majority of spending attributed to
individuals with chronic diseases.
Yet in a review of clinical trials published in
major medical journals, Zulman and her
colleagues found that one in five trials
excluded patients based on their age alone.
Furthermore, almost half of the remaining
trials excluded individuals using criteria
that could disproportionately impact older
adults, such as physical frailty or impaired
cognition.
The study also found that trials rarely assess
how treatments affect function and quality
of life, outcomes that are often of great
importance to older individuals.
"These practices leave health care providers in
the dark when determining which treatment
will best serve the needs of their
patients," says Zulman.
"It is rarely appropriate to exclude people
from clinical trials based on their age
alone," argues Jeremy B. Sussman, M.D., a
study co-author and a Veterans Affairs
scholar with the RWJF Clinical Scholars
program at the U-M.
"This is especially true in trials
investigating conditions that are common in
older adults."
The study authors suggest that clinical trial
evidence guiding treatment of older adults
would be improved by eliminating upper age
limits for study inclusion, by reducing the
use of eligibility criteria that
disproportionately affect older patients,
and by encouraging adherence to recommended
analytical methods for evaluating treatment
effects by age.
"There's a critical need to ensure that
research findings are relevant for our most
complex and vulnerable older patients," says
Zulman. "Our findings suggest a need for
policy change by government agencies like
the Food and Drug Administration and the
National Institutes of Health to increase
the representation of typical older adults
in clinical trials."