First State-by-state 'Report Card' on
care
for the dying finds mediocre care nationwide
Last Acts Report Highlights 'Islands of Excellence' Despite Grim National
Picture Opinion Poll Shows Americans Dissatisfied and Seeking to Reduce
Financial Burden, Physical Pain and Emotional Stress Associated with End of
Life
More stories
on Hospice care, usage
Failing to care for dying...Palliative care, including hospice care, is
widely recognized as the best...
Hospice Use up in 2002...
Study shows increasing use of Hospices across
the nation, discusses misconceptions about
Hospices
Rural Hospices receive grants...A
change in the way payments are
determined for hospice care
will results in ... The
overall projected increase for all
hospice providers is $60
million
Families Inform Roadmap to
Improve Care for Dying in Nursing Homes...End-of-life
care in nursing homes often results in
unnecessary suffering due mainly to a lack
of staff time, training and communication,
according to a new AARP study conducted at
Brown Medical School...
Hospice helps, but doctors
often
don’t recommend it soon enough...The
hospice philosophy of end-of-life care
emphasizes the right to die with dignity and
without pain. The role of hospice is to
provide care to the dying and support for
their families and caregivers.
America
does only a mediocre job of caring for its most seriously ill and dying
patients, according to the nation's first state-by-state "report
card" on end-of-life care released today. Last Acts, the nation's
largest coalition working for better care and caring near the end of life,
issued today's report, grading all 50 states and the District of Columbia on
eight key elements of end-of-life care. Most states earned C's, D's and even
E's on the majority of the criteria.
Corroborating these data, Last Acts also
today released a national survey showing that a significant number of
Americans, including those who have recently lost a loved one, are
dissatisfied with the way the country's health care system provides care to
the dying. The survey found that 93 percent of Americans believe improving
end-of-life care is important.
The "report card" -- Means to a
Better End: A Report on Dying in America Today -- evaluates the availability
and use of key services. It is the product of more than a year's study by
Last Acts, a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation funded campaign whose honorary
chair is former First Lady Rosalynn Carter. Last Acts comprises more than
1,000 Partner organizations, including the American Medical Association, the
American Nurses Association, the American Hospital Association, AARP and
NAACP. An interactive special report on Means to a Better End, including
research findings, is available on The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Web
site,http://www.rwjf.org/special/betterend
"Changing the way America cares for
the dying amounts to no less than a major social change," said Dr.
Steven Schroeder, president of The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, the
nation's largest philanthropy devoted exclusively to health and health care.
"As this report points out, although we have begun making progress on
many fronts, today we find ourselves at a crossroads. We need the dedicated
support of policymakers and health care leaders to put us on the path to
establishing end-of-life care once and for all as an integral part of
American medicine."
In the report, each state receives letter
grades on each of eight key elements of palliative care. Palliative care,
including hospice care, is widely recognized as the best approach for the
seriously ill and dying. It relieves pain and other physical symptoms while
supporting patients and families emotionally and spiritually and respecting
their cultural traditions.
The report was compiled using the most
recent data available, which were reviewed by national experts in
end-of-life care.
Overall findings are:
State Advance Directive Policies: Some
states' laws include confusing language or create bureaucratic hurdles that
make it difficult for citizens to express their preferences or to designate
appropriate surrogate decision-makers.
Location of Death: Although research shows
that 70 percent of Americans would prefer to be at home with loved ones in
their final days, only about 25 percent die at home. Where people die -in a
hospital, a nursing home, hospice or at home-depends on the state or
community where they live and the health care resources available there.
Research has shown that these factors outweigh patient preferences.
Rate of Hospice Use: Hospice care is a
"gold standard" for end-of-life care. However, hospice is not
widely used in most states. Furthermore, the average length of stay in
hospice has dropped to well below the 60 days considered necessary for
people to get maximum benefit. In fact, dying patients commonly have the
support of hospice care for less than a week.
Hospital End-of-Life Care Services: Though
the number of organized palliative care programs in hospitals is increasing,
such programs are not yet the norm. Nor do a sufficient number of hospitals
offer pain management programs and hospice services.
Care in Intensive Care Units at the End of
Life: Nationwide, 28 percent of Medicare patients who die are treated in
ICUs in their last six months of life. The rate varies widely, even within
individual states. Patients in ICUs typically are subjected to heavy use of
technology. This may be at the expense of attention to comfort or against
expressed treatment preferences-often expressed as "I don't want to die
hooked up to machines."
Persistent Pain among Nursing Home
Residents: Nearly half of the 1.6 million Americans living in nursing homes
have persistent pain that is not noticed and not adequately treated.
State Pain Management Policies: All states
have laws addressing the use of controlled substances. Some are effective,
but others create formidable barriers to good pain management.
Numbers of Physicians and Nurses Certified
in Palliative Care: Palliative care training for the nation's physicians and
nurses lags far behind the needs of the aging U.S. population. This is true
for medical and nursing students, as well as for the hundreds of thousands
of professionals already in practice.
"Dying patients and their families
today suffer more than they should," said Judith R. Peres, deputy
director of Last Acts and the leader of the report's research team. "We
still have a long way to go to improve health care and policy for this
segment of the American population."
Peres noted that the Last Acts report
offers a broad-brush statistical portrait of care for the dying across
America, not a detailed analysis of each end-of-life care program in every
state. "We know most states can cite examples of excellent care and
progress being made to improve care," she said. "For example, over
the past five years, we have seen an increase in the number of schools and
textbooks teaching end-of-life care to medical and nursing students. State
and local coalitions have developed innovative programs to improve care such
as those making it easier for people to write advance directives. And more
professional groups are getting involved in end-of-life care, including
clergy, social workers and pharmacists.
"Fortunately we have examples of good
end of life care. These examples take us part-way to understanding what is
needed to fix the problem. To complete the journey, we recommend certain
improvements," she said.
The Last Acts report recommends the following:
Federal Policy: Medicare must be
reformed to meet the needs of seriously ill and dying people. Benefits,
coverage and payments must be altered to allow for seamless
patient-centered care for those facing progressive, serious and terminal
illnesses.
State Policy: In many states, people
will suffer needless pain until state lawmakers change the rules that
affect doctors' ability to prescribe needed medications.
Health Care Leaders: Physicians, nurses
and other health care professionals must be specially trained in
palliative care, and hospitals and nursing homes should have programs to
deliver this care effectively. Research and data collection priorities
must be established and funded.
Families: Citizens need to understand
more about end-of-life care choices and join coalitions working to
expand the choices in their communities. Before placing a loved one in a
nursing home or hospital, families should ask if the institution has a
palliative care program- and if not, the family should find an
institution that does.
Opinion Poll Shows Desire for Improved Care
Along with the national report card, Last
Acts simultaneously released a public opinion poll today showing that the
majority of Americans are critical of the care dying people in this country
receive. Results also showed that most Americans believe improving care is
important.
The survey found that six in 10 Americans
give our current health care system a rating of only fair or lower,
including a quarter who rate it as poor. Only one in 10 gives the system a
rating of very good or excellent.
The poll, conducted by Lake Snell Perry
& Associates surveyed 1,002 adults between August 30 and September 1,
2002. Three-quarters of those surveyed reported having lost a loved one -
such as a family member or close friend - recently (in the past five years).
People who had suffered these recent losses and people who had not were
equally critical of the health care system's care for the dying, with 59
percent and 56 percent, respectively, giving a rating of only fair or worse.
Three-quarters of those surveyed rated the
health care system fair or lower on assuring that families' savings are not
depleted by end-of-life care. Almost half (47 percent) gave a rating of
poor. Those who had had a loved one die recently were more likely to give a
poor rating on this item than those who had not (49 percent vs. 40 percent).
When asked to rate the health care system
for its ability to provide emotional support for the dying and their
families, 46 percent of the respondents said the system does an only fair or
poor job. Four in 10 believe the system is doing a good, very good, or
excellent job in this area. Those who had suffered a loss recently were
again more likely to give a poor rating than those who had not.