Medical School study finds patients
diagnosed with coronary heart disease
continue poor diets…Study finds high
percentage of CHD patients have not made
changes to improve health
January 30, 2008--WORCESTER,
MA.—More
than 13 million Americans have survived a
heart attack or have been diagnosed with
coronary heart disease (CHD), the number one
cause of death in the United States.
In addition to medications, lifestyle
changes, such as a healthy diet and
exercise, are known to reduce the risk for
subsequent cardiac events.
Despite this evidence, a high proportion of
heart attack survivors do not follow their
doctor’s advice to adhere to a healthy diet,
according to researchers at the University
of Massachusetts Medical School (UMMS).
Many studies have centered on determining dietary risk factors for
developing CHD, but few investigations have
studied the diets of CHD patients
following diagnosis.
In “Dietary Quality 1 Year after Diagnosis of Coronary Heart
Disease,” published in the February issue of
the Journal of the American Dietetic
Association, researchers measured the diet
quality of 555 CHD patients one year after a
diagnostic coronary angiography.
Using the Alternative Health Eating Index (AHEI) to assess diet
quality, they found that a high proportion
of those patients had not made the necessary
improvements to their diets to help reduce
the risk of a secondary CHD event.
Proven to be a strong predictor of CHD, the AHEI is a measure that
isolates dietary components that are most
strongly linked to CHD risk reduction.
“This study found that CHD patients’ diets had not improved in the
year after being diagnosed,” said Yunsheng
Ma, MD, PhD, MPH, assistant professor of
medicine and one of the study’s lead
authors.
“We know that a healthy diet is one of the most important
components of a healthy lifestyle,
especially for patients following a cardiac
event, and yet patients are not acting on
this knowledge.”
To determine the quality of CHD patients’ diets, Dr. Ma and
colleagues collected data from a 24-hour
dietary recall one year after the
participants’ CHD diagnoses.
The dietary recall is an assessment tool administered by a
dietitian, who interacts with the patient to
examine the patient’s entire food intake
from a 24-hour period, including complete
food descriptions, preparation and amount.
Prior to the recall, patients were given food models that
identified different foods and serving
sizes, to improve recall and estimation.
Nutrient scores were computed, and the AHEI
was then calculated to determine dietary
quality, which included intake of fruits,
vegetables, nuts and soy, ratio of white to
red meat, cereal fiber, trans-fat, ratio of
polyunsaturated fat to saturated fat, and
alcohol.
Of a maximum 80 points—which indicates the healthiest diet—the
average AHEI score was 30.8, with individual
scores ranging between 5.1 and 69.8.
The mean AHEI score was poorer than scores reported for samples of
healthy individuals from the Health
Professional’s Follow-up Study and the
Nurses’ Health Study. In a previous study by
Ma and colleagues, the AHEI of several
popular weight loss plans was calculated;
the highest scoring diet was the Ornish Diet
(AHEI = 64.6) and lowest scoring diet was
the Atkins diet (AHEI= 42.3).
The fact that one year after a coronary event patients with known
CHD still have lower AHEI scores than these
popular diets may be indicative of the
complex issues of effecting and sustaining
behavioral change and the confusion patients
may face in navigating through dietary
recommendations.
When examining AHEI components, only 12.4 percent of the
participants met the optimal daily
consumption of vegetables and 7.8 percent
for fruit. Only 8 percent of the patients
met the cereal fiber recommendation, and 5.2
percent of the participants limited their
trans-fat intake to 0.5 percent of total
calories or less. In addition, nearly 11
percent of calories were from saturated fat
(less than 7 percent is recommended), while
total fiber was only 16.8 grams per day (25
grams or more per day is recommended).
The researchers evaluated the association of each patient’s diet in
relation to his or her sociodemographic and
clinical standings and found that low
dietary quality was associated with smoking,
lower educational levels, obesity, high-fat
intake and a lower calorie intake. On
average, smokers scored six units lower than
non-smokers; participants with education
beyond high school scored three units higher
than participants with a high school
education; and obese participants scored
four units lower than normal weight or
overweight participants.
“An overwhelming number of CHD patients, roughly 80 percent, do not
attend cardiac rehabilitation programs,
which instruct CHD patients about proper
diet and exercise,” said Ira Ockene, MD, the
David and Barbara Milliken Professor of
Preventive Cardiology and professor of
medicine at UMMS and cardiologist at UMass
Memorial Medical Center.
“Changing one’s eating habits is a long-term process, and optimal
care should include cardiac rehabilitation
and appointments with dietitians, which can
build upon the patient’s initial foundations
to improve his or her diet and overall
health.”
According to study co-author and UMass Memorial Medical Center
registered dietitian Barbara Olendzki, RD,
MPH, an assistant professor of medicine at
UMMS, “Physicians and health care providers
should consider placing more of an emphasis
on dietary counseling, along with exercise,
for CHD patients. Nutrition counseling and
patient dietary changes can lead to
significant improvements in subsequent CHD
risk and better quality of life.”
Dr. Ma agreed and suggested that, “It is important for physicians
to refer CHD patients to the cardiac
rehabilitation programs and encourage
attendance. Future studies should be
conducted and directed toward integrating
nutrition education materials in cardiac
rehabilitation programs.
"Nutrition education
can have a significant impact on a patient’s
overall dietary quality and body-weight
control and on subsequent cardiac events and
mortality.”
This research was supported by a grant from the National Heart,
Lung and Blood Institute.
The University of Massachusetts Medical School, one of the fastest
growing academic health centers in the
country, has built a reputation as a
world-class research institution,
consistently producing noteworthy advances
in clinical and basic research.
The Medical School attracts more than $174 million in research
funding annually, 80 percent of which comes
from federal funding sources. UMMS is the
academic partner of UMass Memorial Health
Care, the largest health care provider in
Central Massachusetts. For more information,
visit www.umassmed.edu.