Now, keep up to date
with daily feeds of newly posted stories
about America's Seniors...click on the box
to the left
Click here
to read story about calcium debunking by
nutrtionist
Q&A: Your
questions about calcium answered
How much calcium should I be getting?
The official recommendation is 1,000
milligrams (mg) a day for adults ages 19 to
50 and 1,200 mg for those past the
half-century mark. Those amounts include
calcium from all sources: dairy products,
other food and drinks, and calcium
supplements.
But there’s a dissenting point of view that
600 mg to 1,000 mg a day is sufficient,
perhaps even more healthful.
How much calcium am I
getting if I don’t take a supplement?
A reasonably good diet that includes some
fruit and vegetables provides about 200 mg
to 300 mg daily — and that’s without any
dairy products.
A well-rounded diet with some servings of
milk and dairy products puts you well into
the neighborhood of 600 mg to 800 mg a day.
Is it better to get calcium from supplements
or from food?
Studies have repeatedly found that we’re far
better off getting most of our nutrients
from food rather than from pills. With
calcium, it’s more complicated. In many
ways, dairy products, and milk in
particular, are an ideal source of the
mineral.
The calcium content is high and easily
absorbed. But when dairy comes into the
diet, saturated fat comes with it, and high
saturated fat intake increases
cardiovascular risk.
Furthermore, a few studies suggest that
dairy food itself increases the risk of
certain cancers.
You can easily get around the saturated fat
problem by buying nonfat dairy products.
Some vegetables are a good source of
calcium, but spinach, chard, and a few
others also contain oxalate, and the
presence of oxalate interferes with the
absorption of calcium.
Bottom line: food is the preferred way to
get a nutrient, calcium included.
The best food choices for calcium include
nonfat dairy products (in limited amounts),
as well as certain types of fish (canned
salmon and sardines) and vegetables (collard
greens are a winner).
If I need a supplement, which one should I
take?
Most calcium supplements are made with
either calcium carbonate or calcium citrate.
Calcium
carbonate needs stomach acid to be absorbed,
so if it is the source of calcium in your
supplement (check the label) it’s best to
take it just after a meal.
Calcium citrate isn’t as dependent on
stomach acid, so it can be taken any time.
People taking medications that reduce
stomach acid — such as the proton-pump
inhibitors (Prevacid, Prilosec) or the H2
blockers (Tagamet, Zantac) — should take a
calcium citrate supplement because lower
amounts of stomach acid mean they won’t
absorb calcium carbonate properly.
The big advantage of calcium carbonate over
calcium citrate is that it contains twice as
much calcium.
The labels on the bottles sometimes make it
seem like both kinds of tablets provide the
same amount of calcium, usually 500 mg to
600 mg.
But that’s the amount of calcium per
“serving” and if you read the label you’ll
see that the serving size for the calcium
citrate supplements is usually two tablets,
but for the calcium carbonate supplements,
it’s just one.
It’s a waste to double the serving size. The
body can absorb a 500- or 600-mg dose, but
more than that and absorption becomes
inefficient.
You’ll get about the same amount of calcium
by taking 1,000 mg as you would if you stuck
with the 500 mg or 600 mg.
Does calcium prevent fractures?
High calcium intake does result in high
levels of calcium in the blood, which
inhibits bone resorption—the part of the
bone tissue “life cycle” in which bone
tissue breaks down.
If calcium levels in the blood are low, bone
resorption can help nudge them back to
normal.
But in the process, bones get weaker and are
more likely to fracture.
In theory, keeping calcium levels in the
blood high prevents that chain of events
from happening.
But in several epidemiological studies,
including some based at Harvard, people with
high calcium intake haven’t, as a group,
broken fewer bones than people with skimpy
intake.
Randomized trials, which have made
head-to-head comparisons between calcium and
a placebo, have shown some improvement in
bone density but not so much in the
prevention of fractures.
One possible explanation is that in the long
run, there are other factors — muscle
strength, balance, physical activity,
vitamin D intake — that outweigh calcium
intake in determining fracture risk.
There is disagreement about how much weight
to give the negative evidence. Not every
finding has been negative.
In one important trial, the women who
consistently took their calcium pills, along
with 400 international units (IU) of vitamin
D, did have significantly fewer broken hips.
Moreover, despite the debate, the official
calcium recommendations remain at the 1,000
mg and 1,200 mg level.
But it’s safe to say that there are now some
doubts about whether high calcium intake
lives up to its billing as the best way to
prevent bone breaks.
Many calcium supplements include vitamin D.
Could that make a difference?
It might. Vitamin D aids in the absorption
of calcium (and phosphorus), but the
evidence from studies of calcium and vitamin
D combinations shows mixed results.
Part of the problem may be the vitamin D
dose. Several important studies used 400 IU,
and it may take double that amount of
vitamin D to make a big difference in bone
health.
Most of the current batch of calcium–vitamin
D products contain either 200 IU or 400 IU
of D.
Vitamin D is believed to have a multitude of
benefits, and many of us have less of it in
our bodies than we should, partly because we
don’t spend much time outdoors.
Sunlit skin generates the active form of the
vitamin, thus the “sunshine vitamin”
nickname.
There’s a school of thought that says we
need to ramp up our vitamin D intake to
1,000 IU or more a day and ease off the
calcium.
Does high calcium
intake cause kidney stones?
About 80% of the time kidney stones are made
of calcium, so on the surface it makes sense
that calcium intake might cause stones.
But studies going back to the 1990s have
shown just the opposite: high calcium
intake, if it comes from food, makes
developing a kidney stone
less
likely.
One possible explanation is that calcium
retards the absorption of oxalate, a
molecule that often mixes with calcium to
cause kidney stones.
Oxalate is found in many plant foods,
including some varieties of berries,
spinach, nuts, and some grains.
Several studies have found that calcium
supplements, in contrast to calcium from
food, are associated with a slight increase
in the risk for kidney stones.
Researchers have speculated that if people
take calcium pills separately from meals, or
at just one meal a day (typically
breakfast), then calcium may be absent from
the gut much of the time and not available
for oxalate-blocking duties.
Will taking calcium supplements deposit
calcium in my arteries?
CT scans show calcium deposits in the
atherosclerotic plaques in arteries, so
there’s been some concern that high calcium
intake might “feed” those deposits.
But calcium deposits are a consequence of
the inflammatory processes that produce the
atherosclerosis and probably have little to
do with blood levels of the mineral.
The way to avoid calcium deposits in your
arteries is to follow a heart healthy
lifestyle: exercising, avoiding cigarette
smoking, and controlling blood pressure,
blood sugar, and cholesterol levels.
And calcium might help in that regard
because it seems to help lower blood
pressure and cholesterol levels.
The results of a New Zealand study published
in 2008 caused some concern because it
showed that women who took calcium (1,000 mg
daily of calcium citrate) were more, not
less, likely to have heart attacks and other
cardiovascular problems, compared with those
who took a placebo.
But, as the researchers noted, this was a
preliminary finding that might prompt more
research and far from a final verdict on
calcium and cardiovascular risk.
Is there really a connection between calcium
and cancer?
The good news: studies have pretty
consistently shown that people with high
calcium intake and lots of dairy products in
their diet are less likely to get colon
cancer.
Less certain are findings that suggest some
protective effect for lung and breast
cancer. The bad news?
A number of studies have linked calcium and
dairy intake to ovarian cancer and
advanced-stage prostate cancer. However, it
is important to keep in mind that the
evidence is suggestive, not definitive, and
a long way off from being proven.
For more information on calcium and other
important nutrients, order our Special
Health Report, Vitamins and Minerals: What you need to know,
at
www.health.harvard.edu/VM.
... ..
...
...