Questionnaire identifies women at risk
of inherited breast or ovarian cancer
Protocol could determine need for additional screening,
preventive treatment
A simplified way for patients to report and update their
family medical histories could help identify women who have
inherited genetic mutations that increase their risk for breast or
ovarian cancer. In the November issue of the journal Cancer,
researchers from the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Cancer
Center report how a questionnaire completed by women coming to the
center for mammograms can detect those at increased risk, which
could signal the need for further screening and preventive therapies
and allow earlier diagnosis. The study is receiving early online
release.
"In order to identify patients at high risk, physicians must
take thorough family histories and then accurately interpret that
information, something that can be difficult since many nuances can
determine risk," says Kevin Hughes, MD, of the MGH Surgical Oncology
Division, the study's senior author. "In addition, family history
can change over time if a patient's relatives develop cancer. We
need an easier way to both update data and reevaluate each patient's
situation."
Previous research has shown that about 20 percent of women
who develop breast or ovarian cancer have family histories that
suggest they may have inherited a mutation that would put them at
elevated risk. In comparison, the family histories of only 3 to 6
percent of women who had not developed those cancers indicate
elevated risk. The current study was designed to further investigate
the extent to which women with these mutations are not being
identified and to evaluate a less labor-intensive method of
collecting and analyzing family history information.
During the eight-month study period, about 14,000 women who
came to the Avon Breast Evaluation Center at MGH completed a
questionnaire on their family history of breast or ovarian cancer,
whether they had developed any tumors and related factors. The
information was gathered either with written questionnaires scanned
into a computer or on handheld tablet computers. It was downloaded
into a database that was immediately available to the patients'
physicians and was later analyzed with a protocol designed to
evaluate the risk that the patients carried mutations in BRCA1 or
BRCA2, the so-called "breast-cancer genes."
Among the 1,764 participants who had been diagnosed with
breast or ovarian cancer, 20.6 percent had family histories
indicating elevated risk of one of the tumor-associated mutations.
Risk levels were even higher among participants who'd had ovarian
cancer and those of Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry, a group known to have
higher incidence of the mutations. The earlier study that found
similar risk levels used a more complicated risk-assessment
procedure conducted by a genetic counselor, a resource not available
in many centers.
"We wanted to show we could identify these high-risk women
with an automated system that provides accurate information without
requiring more work for our staff, an approach that has been tried
in very few centers worldwide," says Hughes. "In addition to
verifying the utility of this strategy, these results remind us how
many women who should be tested for these genetic mutations are not
being screened." Hughes is an assistant professor of Surgery at
Harvard Medical School.
The researchers note that women diagnosed with the
cancer-associated mutations can pursue a number of options.
Preventive approaches include treatment with tamoxifen or
contraceptive drugs and prophylactic removal of the breasts or
ovaries. More frequent screenings with mammograms and MRI imaging
can lead to early diagnosis. And for those who develop tumors,
mutation status can help determine the best treatment strategies.
The team is continuing to administer the questionnaire to patients
at the MGH and will begin doing so at Newton-Wellesley Hospital, an
affiliated institution, in the near future. They also will
investigate methods for informing women of their mutation status and
managing the expected increase in patients requiring follow-up care.
###
The study's co-authors are lead author Francisco Dominguez,
MD, along with Julie Jones, MD, Katherina Zabicki, MD, Barbara
Smith, MD, PhD, Michele Gadd, MD, Michele Specht, MD, and James
Michaelson, PhD, of MGH Surgical Oncology; and Daniel Kopans, MD and
Richard Moore of MGH Breast Imaging.