Joint
replacement the second time around
Newswise — Americans are getting
more new hip and knee implants than ever
before—nearly a half-million a year. This boom in
joint replacement has made the procedure somewhat
routine and widely available.
But when it comes time to have
that initial implant replaced, due to wear or
failure, the procedure is anything but routine,
according to an article in the March issue of
Cleveland Clinic Arthritis Advisor.
“Revision surgery is a far
longer and more complex procedure than initial
surgery,” says Kenneth Marks, M.D., an orthopaedic
surgeon at Cleveland Clinic. “It requires more time
and expertise to remove the old implant and do a
customized repair and realignment of the existing
bone to ensure that the new implant will be held
firmly in place.”
Growing demand
Though the challenge of
revision surgery is higher, the demand is climbing.
More and more patients who got their first new hip
or knee at age 55 or 60 are outliving the useful
life of their implants.
Advanced age is becoming less
of an impediment. Even among people 80 and older,
the benefits of joint revision surgery—pain
elimination, increased mobility, greater range of
motion—can outweigh the risks, as long as you’re
healthy enough to undergo such surgery in the first
place.
Why
revision?
Though implants may need to be
replaced for a variety of reasons, the most common
one is loosening. Loosening starts with the tiny
particles that eventually wear off the plastic liner
or insert within the hip or knee.
As some of these particles
slowly find their way to where implant meets bone,
they get absorbed by cells (macrophages) capable of
triggering bone reabsorption (osteolysis). Over
time, this dissolving away of bone leads to implant
loosening and pain.
Implant designers have slowed
the creation of such particles by using harder,
cross-linked plastics, and have nearly eliminated
them altogether with newer ceramic-on-ceramic and
metal-on-metal designs. The result has been
increased implant longevity, meaning implants can
now be done earlier to meet the longer lifespan of
people who get them.
Other less-common reasons
revision surgery may be needed include inadequate
bone ingrowth, infection, dislocation, and fracture.
When hip implants are inserted without cement, they
depend on the growth of bone into the porous surface
of the implant over time to ensure stability. Should
this process not be fully achieved due to poor bone
metabolism, the implant can more easily loosen
later.
Infections can also be a cause
of hip or knee implant removal, either early on, due
to bacteria getting into the incision site, or years
later, should blood-borne germs reach the implant
and prove resistant to antibiotic therapy. Falls
leading to fracture, or dislocation can also
necessitate removal and replacement of the implant.
Follow the pain
Increasing pain near the
implant, or greater difficulty in placing weight on
it are early indications that revision surgery may
be needed.
“The location of your pain
tells us which part of your implant may be loose,”
says Dr. Marks. “If it’s more of a groin pain, then
the acetabular side is likely the problem. If it’s
more of a thigh pain, then the loosening is
typically on the femoral side.”
With knee implants, pain just
below the knee suggests that the metal implant in
the tibia may be loose, but pain that is felt
throughout the knee may indicate infection.
Scans show the way
Whatever clues your pain
provides need to be confirmed with an X-ray scan.
“We can see if there is poor ingrowth on a hip
implant, or if the plastic insert in your knee is
worn,” says Dr. Marks.
If an X-ray suggests serious
bone erosion, such that what remains may not be
enough to provide sufficient contact between the
bone and new implant, a computed tomography (CT)
scan will be done to get a more precise view of the
erosion. This will help the surgeon determine what
needs to be done to repair the damage before proper
alignment of a new implant is possible.
Out
with the implant
A variety of factors make hip
or knee revision surgery a much more lengthy,
complex procedure than the initial surgery. “It’s
not unusual for these surgeries to last five to
eight hours or more,” says Dr. Marks.
Removing the old implant is a
problem not faced the first time around. Not only
must the previous device be taken out, but any
cement that remains inside the bones must be cleaned
out, as well. In hip revisions, the upper shaft of
the femur that surrounds the old implant will often
be cut away in two or three long sections (osteotomy)
to enable implant removal and cleaning of the
femoral canal. These pieces later will be
reassembled and wired together around the stem of
the new implant.
In
with bone grafts
The most customized part of a
hip or knee revision is the strategy used for
restoring the damaged joint surfaces. “There is no
one typical way to do this,” says Dr. Marks. “It
varies with the degree and location of erosion, and
the surgeon’s experience.”
At a minimum, there needs to be
at least 50 percent surface contact between bone and
the implant for a lasting, secure grip to be
possible. Any less and the pits, holes, and other
cavities need to be repaired using bone grafts,
usually a thick paste of bone chips (morselized
bone) made by grinding up cadaver bones.
In a hip revision, bone paste
may be used to strengthen the pelvic socket or
repair erosion along the inner canal of the femoral
shaft. And if the erosion is severe, the socket may
need to be rebuilt and reinforced using wire mesh or
a titanium ring, in order to regain more normal
biomechanics.
In a knee revision, if the end
of the femur is weak, even after trimming away
damaged bone, the central canal will need to be
partially filled with morselized bone. In some
cases, metal wedges may be required to better secure
the attachment of the new femoral component.
Risks reduced
The many factors that
complicate revision surgery—less healthy bone, an
older patient, greater infection risk, and a
customized array of bone, implant, grafts, and
support structures—mean that it’s easier for at
least one of these things to go wrong over time.
“Hip and knee revisions
typically last about eight to 10 years, compared to
the 20 or more years you can expect with a
first-time implant,” says Dr. Marks.
Though still a serious
operation, joint revision is not as fraught with
risk as it used to be. “We used to discourage
revisions due to obesity, advanced age, and other
complications,” says Dr. Marks. “But as we’ve gained
experience in limiting the risks, we’ve become more
permissive. As long as you’re healthy enough to
undergo major surgery, you’re healthy enough to have
a revision.”
WHAT
YOU CAN DO
Don’t overdo it. Excessive and
repetitive overloading of your hip or knee implant
can lead to premature loosening.
Let the pain guide you.
Increasing pain in the area of your implant is the
first indication you may need revision surgery.
Seek a specialist. The
complications of revision surgery mean that it’s
best to seek out a surgeon who does a large number
of revisions.
Don’t give up on rehab. Though
rehab is similar the second time around, it takes
longer to regain muscle strength and range of motion
due to additional scarring.