counter customizable free hit

America's Seniors at www.TodaysSeniorsNetwork.com
 

 

 

 

 

 

Have Diabetes?  Your supplies may be covered!

U.S. trial shows no early Mortality Benefit from annual Prostate Cancer Screening among those with limited life-expectancy
 
 


Home
Up
Active Surveillance
Advance Diagnosis
Advantages, Complications
Combo Treatment Works
African-American Men at Risk
Aggrressive Gene
Anxiety and Treatment
Artifical Light Impact
Biochemical Failure
Blood Test Detection
Calcium, Prostate Death
Cancer Free
Cancer Suppression
Choosing Prostate Treatment
Combined Therapies
Combo No Impact
Consider Risks, Benefits
Dietary Role
Dramatic Outcomes
EarlierProstate Screenings
Early Stage Treatment
Family History Impact
Few Radiation Effects
Free Prostate Screening
Gene Fusion Test
Green Tea Benefit
Harmful Radiation Link
Herbal Therapy
Hereditary Markers
High Risk Group
Hormonal Speeds Progression
Hormone Therapy Danger
Immune System Role
Improved Recognition
Influences on Prostate Tests
Less is More
Limited Benefit
Lower Cholesterol
Low-Income Victims
Male Sling Procedure
Microwave Treatment Problems
More Effective Treatment
Neglected Treatment Factors
Nerve Growth
New Prostate Publication
New Prostate Test
Non-Invasive Test
No Superior Treatment
No Tests Older Men
Olive Oil Benefit
Other Prostate Problems
Post-Operative Impact
Promegranate Benefit
Prostate Age Limit?
Prostate Biiomarkers
Prostate Blood Marker
Prostate Cancer Counseling
Prostate Cancer Indicators
Prostate Institute
Prostate Decision Aids
Prostate, Dietary Risk
Prostate Genetic Link
Prostate Health Month
Prostate, Heart Attacks
Prostate, Radiation
Prostate Screening
Prostate Seeds
Prostate Vaccine
Prostate Treatments
Prostatitis in Men
Prostate Stem Cells
Prostate Surveillance
Radiation Role
Red Wine Aids Prostate
Reducing Risk
Red Wine Benefit
Religion Impact Screening
Remember Appointments
Robotic Prostate Surgery
Screening for Elderly
Screening Involvement
Season of Diagnosis
Slow Prostate Cancer Spread
Spread to Organs
Statin Beneficial
Statins, Prostate Cancer
Stress Management
Supplement Benefit
Surgery Success
Therapy Questioned
Unwanted Effect Possible
Urinary Problems to Increase
Vaccine Eases Pain
Vitamin A Stays 'Active'
Walks Cut Bone Loss
Treating Larger Patients
Treatment Outcome
Trust, Early Treatment
Wife's Stress Harmful
Wives Aid Screening
Zinc Aids Prostate
30-Year Valid Tests
Tests Policy Urged

Home
Acupuncture Aid
African-American Tests
Age No Barrier
Aging and Cancer
Alcohol Cancer Risk
Alcohol,Smoking Link
Amputation Benefit?
Anemia Drug Dangerous
Armstrong Support
Aspirin Helps
Aspirin,Prostate
Asthma-Cancer Link
Attacking Brain Cancer
Avoid Thin,Fat
Awareness Issues
Blacks, Cancer
Body Composition
Bogus 'Cures'
Benefit Disputed
Bladder Cancer News
Boston Cancer Suvivors
Brain Cancer News
Breast Cancer
Cancer Related Fatigue
Increase Awareness
Cancer, Aging Treatments
Cancer Case
Cancer Cells
Cancer Deaths Decline
Cancer, Enzyme Link
Cancer, Heart
Cancer Link
Cancer Infection?
Cancer Policy
Cancer Rate Decline
Cancer Report
Cancer Risk
Cancer Risk Women
Cancer Spa
Cancer Spread
Cancer Survival
Cancer Survivors
Carolina Cancer Initative
Cartilage No Value
Celebrating Cancer Surival
Cervical Cancer News
Colon Cancer
Difficult Cancer Therapy
Disparities Adressed
Detect Lung Cancer
Earlier Cancer Notification
Elderly CLL Patients
Esophagus Cancer Treatment
Exercise Reduces Risk
Evaluating Cancer Therapies
Eye exams, Cancer
Family Awareness
Family Ties
Fewer Biopsies
Fewer Deaths
Firefighters Bladder Cancer
Gains Threatened
Genetic Cancer Markers
Genetic Testing Link
Gilda's 25th Anniversary
Ginger Fights Cancer
GI Perforations
GOLF Magazine Push
Green Tea Helps
Group Therapy Questioned
Head and Neck Cancer
Immigrant Cancer History
Improving Immunity
Immune Deterrent
Ineffective Drug
Inherited Cancer Risk
Lapatinib  minimal effect
Lack of Attention
Lifestyle Changes Benefit
Liver Cancer Pill
Lung Cancer
Lymphoma Survival Rates
Make Informed Choices
Managing Nausea
Marrow Transplant
Measuring Cancer Spread
Men, Bladder Cancer
Minority Awareness
Minority Cancer Awareness
Minority Grants
Minorities, Cancer
Myeloma Treatment
New Detection Method
More Involvement
MRI for Brain Tumors
Neck, Head Cancer
Minority Screenings
New Ginkgo Use
Nurses Halt Chemo
Non-Invasive Detection
Obesity and Cancer
Obesity, Cancer Link
Off-Label Stent Study
Older Survivors
Older Women, Breast Cancer
One-Step Radiation
Oral Chemotherapy Risks
Ovarian Cancer News
Oral Cancer Detection
Ovarian Cancer Awareness
Pain Management Need
Passive Smoke Risk
Patient Meets Donor
Pelvic Fracture Risk
Poverty Link
Preventing Cancer
Preventing Recurrence
Prevention Tips
New Metastatic Treatment
New Sensitive Tests
New Treatment Initiative
Pancreatic Cancer
Prostate Cancer News
Progress Report: Cancer 2007
Racial Treament Differs
Radiology Explained
Radiation Costs Vary
Radiation Resistance
Rally Cancer Awareness
Relief from Sea Possible
Repairing Cells
Screening Benefit
Screening Importance
Self-Fulfilling Prophecy
Skin Cancer News
Smelling Cancer?
Historic 'Brain Trust'
Smoking Hurts Recovery
Soy Helps
Spicing Up Cancer Fight
Stat3 Protein Link
Stomp Out Cancer
Stopping Metastasis
Stop Stomach Cancer
Stress & Cancer
Stress, Cervical Cancer
Surgery Best Option
Surgery Delay Deadly
Surviviors' Music
Survival Priority
Spouses Impacted
Standup2Cancer
Survivor Transition
Survivor Depression
Take Part in Program
Theismann on Prostate
Tea Helps Skin
Test for Cancer Cure
Tips in Recovery
Toad Venom
Tongue Cancer
Treat Bladder Cancer
Treatment Doubts
Treating Cancer Spread
Treatment Barrier
Treatment Differences
Treatment Risk
Trials Started
Tumor Blocker
Tumors Can't Hide
Unsubstantiated Claims
Urban, Rural Stats
Volume Cancer Surgery
Watchful Waiting
Tumor Suppressor
Wine Cuts Risk
Women's Awareness
Women at Risk
Women, Lung Cancer
Yul Brynner Foundation
Zinc Role
2008 Cancer Awareness
Care Disparities
Physics Fights Cancer

 

 

 



Google
 

 

Web TodaysSeniorsNetwork.com
 

AddThis Feed Button   Now, keep up to date with daily feeds of newly posted stories about America's Seniors...click on the box to the left

U.S. trial shows no early Mortality Benefit from annual Prostate Cancer Screening among those with limited life-expectancy

 

Newswise — The prostate cancer screening tests that have become an annual ritual for many men don’t appear to reduce deaths from the disease among those with a limited life-expectancy, according to early results of a major U.S. study involving 75,000 men.

Results released today from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial show that six years of aggressive, annual screening for prostate cancer led to more diagnoses of prostate tumors but not to fewer deaths from the disease.

The study, led by researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis and conducted at 10 sites, will appear online March 18 in the New England Journal of Medicine (and in the journal’s print edition on March 26).

“The important message is that for men with a life expectancy of seven to 10 years or less, it is probably not necessary to be screened for prostate cancer,” says the study’s lead author and principal investigator Gerald Andriole, M.D., chief urologic surgeon at the Siteman Cancer Center at Washington University School of Medicine and Barnes-Jewish Hospital.

But it’s too soon, he added, to make broad screening recommendations for all men based on the study’s initial findings.

“So far, only a minority of men enrolled in the PLCO study have died, so it may be premature to make generalizations about the ultimate results of the trial,” he says.

“We don’t have enough data yet about the youngest men in the study – those in their 50s – and it may be that over time, we will, in fact, see a benefit from screening.”

The PLCO trial began in 1992 with funding from the National Cancer Institute and was designed to determine whether prostate cancer screening reduces deaths from the disease.

It involves men ages 55 to 74 who received either annual PSA blood tests and digital rectal exams or “routine care,” meaning they had the screening tests only if their physicians recommended them.

After seven to 10 years of follow up, deaths from prostate cancer were very low in both groups and did not differ significantly between the groups.

Health guidelines issued last year by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommend against prostate cancer screening for men age 75 or older and concluded there is insufficient evidence to assess the balance of benefits and harms of prostate cancer screening in men younger than 75.

However, the American Urological Association and the American Cancer Society recommend annual prostate cancer screening tests beginning at age 50 for most men.

More than 186,000 U.S. men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer this year, and nearly 29,000 will die from the disease, according to the National Cancer Institute.

PSA blood tests, introduced in 1988, have increasingly been used as a screening tool for prostate cancer, despite a lack of evidence showing they reduce death rates from disease.

The controversy over prostate cancer screening has arisen because most men who undergo a biopsy for an abnormal PSA test do not have prostate cancer.

For those who have cancer, the tumors generally grow so slowly that most men die of other causes.

Furthermore, prostate cancer treatment can result in incontinence and impotence. However, some tumors can be aggressive, and the difficulty has been distinguishing aggressive cancers from those that are slow growing.

 
“We definitely need to find better ways to detect and treat aggressive tumors, those that are truly life-threatening, so that men with slow-growing tumors can avoid unnecessary treatments,” says Andriole.

Today’s results are the first to detail death rates from prostate cancer among men in the PLCO study and are being released to coincide with the presentation of the data at the European Association of Urology meeting in Stockholm, Sweden.

The PLCO data are being made public now because the study’s Data and Safety Monitoring Board, an independent review committee that meets every six months, saw a continuing lack of evidence that screening reduces deaths due to prostate cancer as well as the suggestion that screening may cause men to be treated unnecessarily.

The PLCO investigators will continue to follow patients for several more years to see whether annual screening eventually reduces prostate cancer deaths.

The trial involved 76,693 men, who were randomly assigned to receive either annual PSA blood tests for six years and digital rectal exams for four years or routine care, which included physical checkups but no mandate for annual prostate cancer screening.

The new report includes data for all participants seven years after they joined the trial and for 67% percent of participants 10 years after they joined the trial.

At seven years, there were 22 percent more prostate cancer diagnoses in the men screened annually (2,820 men in the screening group vs. 2,322 in the routine-care group).

This trend has continued in data collected up to 10 years (currently there are 17 percent more prostate cancer diagnoses in the screening group).

Deaths from prostate cancer did not differ significantly between the groups.

Seven years after the start of screening, there were 50 deaths from prostate cancer in the screening group and 44 deaths in the routine-care group.

Ten years after the start of screening, there were 92 prostate cancer deaths in the screening group and 82 in the routine-care group.

“My recommendation is that, for now, men with a life expectancy of more than seven to 10 years continue to be screened for prostate cancer,” says Andriole.

“On the other hand, screening is probably not necessary for elderly men and men with significant health issues.

"These men should have a conversation with their doctors to make an individual decision about whether they want to be screened, because clearly there can be harmful side effects related to treatment, while for these men, there has been no demonstration that screening will prolong their lives.”

Of the men who received annual screening, 85 percent had PSA tests and 86 percent had digital rectal exams.

Men in the routine-care arm sometimes had prostate cancer screening tests: PSA screening ranged from 40 percent of men at the beginning of the study to 52 percent of men by the last screening year, and screening with rectal exams ranged from 41 percent initially to 46 percent by the last screening year.

The exam involves a doctor inserting a lubricated, gloved finger into the rectum to feel for anything that is not normal.

Men were referred for follow up testing for prostate cancer if their PSA level was higher than 4.0 ng/ml or if the rectal exam was abnormal.

The researchers noted that the vast majority of men in both groups who developed prostate cancer were diagnosed with stage II disease (out of IV).

The number of later-stage cases was similar in the two groups. However, men in the routine-care group had more aggressive tumors (Gleason score 8-10).

 The reduced number of men with prostate cancer with a Gleason score of 8-10 in the intervention group may eventually lead to a mortality difference, but data analyzed so far have not shown such a benefit.

Additionally, men in both groups received similar treatments for their disease, which was not dictated by being a participant in the PLCO.

Another study reported in this same online issue of the NEJM is the large European Randomized Trial of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), which shows a 20 percent reduction in the rate of death from prostate cancer but with a high risk of overdiagnosis.

In the ERSPC, unlike the PLCO trial, men were referred for follow-up testing if their PSA level was 3.0 ng/mL or higher and were also screened, on average, every four years as opposed to annually in the PLCO.

Lowering the threshold for what is considered an abnormal PSA to 3.0 ng/ml is likely to diagnose more tumors but not necessarily identify those that are more likely to be aggressive, Andriole says.

Andriole GL, Grubb RL, Buys SS, Chia D, Church TR, Fouad MN, Gelmann EP, Kvale PA, Reding DJ, Weissfeld JL, Yokochi LA, Crawford ED, O’Brien B, Clapp JD, Rathmell JM, Riley TL, Hayes RB, Kramer BS, Izmirlian G, Miller AB, Pinsky PF, Prorok PC, Gohagan JK, and Berg CD. Mortality Results from a Prostate-Cancer Randomized Screening Trial.

Washington University School of Medicine's 2,100 employed and volunteer faculty physicians also are the medical staff of Barnes-Jewish and St. Louis Children's hospitals.

The School of Medicine is one of the leading medical research, teaching and patient care institutions in the nation, currently ranked third in the nation by U.S. News & World Report.

Through its affiliations with Barnes-Jewish and St. Louis Children's hospitals, the School of Medicine is linked to BJC HealthCare.

 

 

 

 

... ..
...
...

 

 

 

 



Home
Up
About Us
America's Seniors WebMall
Aging News
California Report
Caregiving
Community/Workplace
Fitness,Health
Grandparents
Health Care Policy
Hispanic Seniors
Medicare News
Contents/Sitemap
Prescription Drugs
Pharma Suits
Restaurant Reviews
Rural Seniors
Safety & Security
Seniors Commentary
Seniors' Entertainment
Seniors Headlines
Seniors Finances
Seniors' Issues
Seniors Relationships
Seniors Rights
Social Security News
The Virtual Family
Travel News
TSN Radio on Web
Veterans' Tribute
White House Cards
Privacy Policy
Consumer Alert
Pull Plug Heat Costs

 

 

 To Contact Us, Click here
Copyright (C) 1999-2009 TodaysSeniorsNetwork.com