Now, keep up to date
with daily feeds of newly posted stories
about America's Seniors...click on the box
to the left
Senators
introduce bill to strengthen oversight of
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
WASHINGTON
– Today U.S. Senators Herb Kohl (D-WI),
Michael Bennet (D-CO), Claire McCaskill
(D-MO), and Russ Feingold (D-WI) introduced
legislation to significantly improve the
governance and oversight structure of the
federal government’s Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation (PBGC).
In recent months, questions have arisen
concerning the PBGC’s capability to fulfill
its mission to insure the pensions of nearly
44 million Americans, at a time when several
of the country’s largest automobile and
manufacturing companies are teetering on the
edge of bankruptcy.
PBGC’s governance structure was questioned
in May at a hearing held by the Special
Committee on Aging, chaired by Senator
Kohl. In recent months, allegations of
mismanagement by the agency’s former
director, Charles E.F. Millard have
heightened.
With little oversight or approval from the
agency’s board, Millard was able to deviate
from PBGC’s conservative investment strategy
just before the market downturn last year.
In addition, a report released by the PBGC
Inspector General alleged that Millard may
have improperly influenced the procurement
process surrounding the restructure of the
Corporation’s investments.
“Decisions made by PBGC management and a
lack of oversight and governance by previous
PBGC Boards have contributed to the agency’s
financial situation.
The GAO has indicated for years that the
PBGC Board members do not have enough time
or resources to provide the necessary policy
direction and oversight,” said Kohl.
“The role of PBGC is too crucial to allow
its governance to slip through the cracks.”
“The 480,000 Coloradans who have pensions
vested in the PBGC have worked hard their
whole lives on the promise that they will be
able to retire comfortably and with
dignity,” Bennet said.
“This legislation will ensure government
oversight and accountability, and put
safeguards in place to prevent misconduct.
At a time when so many have been hit hard by
the economic downturn, it just makes sense
to protect what Americans have earned.”
"We have to put an end to the insider
dealing that has made Wall Street
connections more important than securing the
pensions of millions of Americans,"
McCaskill said.
“I am pleased to be an original co-sponsor
of this bill, which will strengthen and
improve the Pension Benefits Guaranty
Corporation by allowing more transparency
and establishing greater accountability.
These changes should lead to better policy
decisions to strengthen the overall health
of the PBGC, which is critical as more and
more pensions default in these difficult
economic times,” said Feingold.
The bill would strengthen the agency’s
oversight by expanding its membership,
staggering its members’ terms, and requiring
it to meet four times a year.
The bill will also ensure the PBGC Advisory
Council, Inspector General, and General
Counsel have full and direct access to the
board.
Finally, the bill will require the PBGC
Director to recuse him or herself from
potential conflicts of interest, to include
any involvement with the agency’s Technical
Evaluation Panels. Yesterday,
Brookings Institution released a paper
highlighting the need for stronger
governance of the PBGC.
A summary of the bill can be found below.
The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
Governance Improvement Act
The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC)
insures the pensions of more than 44 million
workers and retirees in over 29,000
employer-sponsored pension plans.
Yet, according to the Government
Accountability Office (GAO) and the PBGC’s
Office of Inspector General (OIG) the
Corporation’s governance structure has
significant flaws that need correction.
The PBGC Governance Improvement Act will
strengthen the board’s ability to provide
policy direction and oversight. This bill
will:
· Expand the PBCG Board of Directors
from 3 to 7 members
The PBGC board is the smallest of any
federal government corporation, composed of
three members: the Secretaries of Labor,
Treasury and Commerce. GAO has reported
that historically
these secretaries do not have the
time or resources to direct and oversee PBGC.
Conversely, other government corporations
average 7.5 members. The PBGC Board also
does not have any standing committees as a
result of its small size, unlike Fortune
1000 companies that have at least two
committees. Other government corporations
average 1.6 board committees and large
public pensions average 3.4 board
committees.
· Stagger board terms to ensure
experienced board members at all times.
Under the current structure, all three board
positions, their representatives, and the
PBGC director typically change with each
administration, culminating in gaps in the
board’s institutional knowledge. By
expanding the board with presidential
appointees serving four year terms beginning
in the second and fourth year of a
presidential administration, this bill
guarantees the board will have institutional
knowledge.
· Require the board to meet at least
four times a year
The Board is currently not required to meet
regularly, and has not met since February
2008 despite the onset of the recession and
the potential pension liability of the
troubled auto industry. Since 1980, the
Board has met only 20 times.
In comparison,
other government corporations’ boards
generally meet about five times per year.
To provide effective policy
direction and oversight, it is absolutely
critical that the board meet regularly.
· Give the advisory committee direct
access to the board
PBGC has an advisory committee charged with
advising the corporation on its investment
strategy, among other things. However, the
advisory committee has not always had access
to the Board, and the PBGC management has
ignored many of its recommendations. To
ensure that the advisory committee’s
recommendations are considered, this bill
will require the advisory committee to meet
with the Board at least once a year. The
bill also gives the advisory committee the
authority to examine and advise on issues
independent from the director.
· Give the Inspector General and
General Counsel direct access to the board
This bill will require the Inspector General
to report to the board, so that the PBGC
Director cannot use their position to
minimize concerns. Also, like other
government corporations, this bill requires
the General Counsel to report to the Board
as well as the Director.
· Requires recusal from potential
conflicts of interest by the PBGC Board and
Director
Prohibits the PBGC Board of Directors and
Director from directly serving on
procurement technical evaluation panels and
disqualifies them from participating in any
matter that may have or appear to have a
conflict of interest.
... ..
...
...