Now, keep up to date
with daily feeds of newly posted stories
about America's Seniors...click on the box
to the left
Self-Management Counseling for Patients with
Heart Failure does not improve outcomes
Newswise, September 2010 — Patients with
mild to moderate heart failure who received
educational materials and self-management
counseling in an attempt to improve
adherence to medical advice did not have a
reduced rate of death or hospitalization
compared to patients who received
educational materials alone, according to a
study in the September 22/29 issue ofJAMA.
There have been advances in the development
of effective therapies for heart failure,
but challenges remain in the delivery of
these therapies to patients.
“Patient
nonadherence to heart failure drugs ranges
from 30 percent to 60 percent and
nonadherence to lifestyle recommendations
from 50 percent to 80 percent, with higher
rates occurring in more socioeconomically
disadvantaged subgroups.
"To
meet the challenge of delivering
evidence-based therapies to patients with
heart failure, research has turned to the
evaluation of disease management, remote
monitoring, and patient self-management
programs,” the authors write.
“Patient
self-management programs aim to motivate
patients to collaborate in their care by
teaching them self-management skills. If
skills such as self-monitoring and
environmental rearrangement can be learned,
maintained, and used to implement medical
advice, this is a potentially cost-effective
approach to controlling heart failure
costs.”
Lynda H. Powell, Ph.D., of Rush University
Medical Center, Chicago, and colleagues
conducted the Heart Failure Adherence and
Retention Trial (HART) to assess the effect
of one year of self-management counseling on
the rate of death or heart failure
hospitalization among 902 patients with mild
to moderate heart failure and reduced or
preserved systolic function (contraction of
the heart).
The patients were randomized between October
2001 and October 2004, with follow-up for 2
to 3 years.
All participants were offered 18 contacts
(group meetings) and 18 heart failure
educational tip sheets during the course of
1 year.
Patients randomized to the education
group received tip sheets in the mail and
telephone calls to check comprehension.
Patients randomized to the self-management
group received tip sheets in groups and were
taught self-management skills to implement
the advice.
On average, the patients in the groups were
approximately 64 years of age, 47 percent
women, 40 percent self-reported
racial/ethnic minority, 52 percent with
annual family income less than $30,000, and
23 percent with preserved systolic function.
Patients were taking an average of 6.8
medications, and 37 percent did not adhere
to at least 80 percent of the prescribed
dosage of either an ACE inhibitor or
beta-blocker. Median (midpoint) sodium
intake was more than recommended for
patients with heart failure or hypertension.
The researchers found that in estimates of
the time to death or heart failure
hospitalization there was no benefit of
self-management compared with education.
During approximately 2.6 years of follow-up,
there were 163 events (40.1 percent) in the
self-management group and 171 (41.2 percent)
in the education group. There was also no
significant differences on other outcomes
such as all-cause hospitalization and
quality of life, or differences between
groups on change in heart or respiratory
rate, blood pressure or body mass index.
“In summary, the results of HART are
consistent with those of past trials. There
appears to be no benefit from
self-management counseling on important
clinical end points in patients with heart
failure.
However, given the epidemic of heart failure
burdening the health care system,
identification of innovative and
cost-effective approaches to outpatient
management is urgently needed. Future trials
might evaluate the benefit of
self-management counseling in low-income
patients,” the authors conclude.