Half of
Americans live more than an hour away from
Lifesaving Stroke Care
Newswise
— When stroke strikes, choking off blood
supply to the brain, every minute counts:
Nearly 2 million neurons die each minute a
stroke is left untreated, making it a race
to recognize symptoms so that lifesaving
“clot-busting” drugs can be administered.
Forty-five percent of Americans – 135
million people -- are more than an hour away
from primary stroke centers, the facilities
that are best equipped to care for them if
they are stricken by the condition,
according to new research led by the
University of Pennsylvania School of
Medicine presented at the American Stroke
Association’s International Stroke
Conference in San Antonio.
Less than a quarter of
U.S. residents can reach one of those
facilities in less than a half hour.
The authors say the
identification of these gaps in access is an
important step in cutting the deadly toll of
stroke, which is the third leading cause of
death and the leading cause of long-term
disability in the United States.
The study revealed one
existing way to narrow these disparities:
Using existing air ambulance resources to
fly stroke patients to appropriate care
would cut the number of Americans without
60-minute access to a primary stroke center
by half.
“Our findings show that
many people do not have timely access to the
type of care that they would need to save
their life or minimize damage from a
stroke,” says senior author Brendan G. Carr,
MD, MS, an assistant professor of Emergency
Medicine and Biostatistics and Epidemiology
at Penn.
“The challenge here is to
think about how we can design a system that
give everyone their best chance of
survival.”
Distance from primary
stroke centers a key factor in how well
patients fare. Currently, less than 10
percent of ischemic stroke patients – those
with blood clots blocking blood flow to the
brain -- receive tPA, the IV clot-dissolving
drug that is proven to slash both the
cognitive and physical disabilities
associated with stroke.
Typically, the drug must
be given within three hours of symptom onset
in order to be most effective.
Unfortunately, precious time may be lost
even before the patient decides to come to
the hospital, since many patients fail to
quickly recognize or act upon stroke
symptoms – which can include weakness,
strange sensations on one side of the body,
confusion, difficulty speaking, visual
problems and dizziness.
The new study results
showed that overall, fewer than 1 in 4
Americans (22 percent) have access to a
primary stroke center within 30 minutes, and
just over half (55 percent) can reach one
within an hour when ambulances are not
permitted to cross state lines.
Patients are most able to
get to a primary stroke center by ground
within 60 minutes if they live in the
Northeast (64 percent), followed by the
Midwest (61 percent). In the South and West
portions of the country, just over half (52
percent and 51 percent) of patients can
reach those advanced facilities within an
hour.
Five states had no
in-state ground access to primary stroke
centers within 60 minutes, and only in the
District of Columbia could all residents
reach such a facility in an hour.
The addition of air
ambulances, however, boosts access
substantially: within a half hour, 26
percent of the population could reach a
primary stroke center, and 79 percent could
be transported to one within 60 minutes. The
improvement found was most dramatic in the
western U.S., where the number of patients
transported within an hour would rise to 81
percent if helicopters were used.
The authors used data from
the U.S. Census Bureau combined with an
inventory of hospitals that have received
certification as primary stroke centers by
the hospital accrediting body known as The
Joint Commission, and they calculated
driving times and ambulance dispatch and
response times between each population
“block group” and the nearest stroke center.
They also obtained data
showing the location of all helipad depots
operated by air medical service providers
across the United States and calculated
similar dispatch and response times to
illustrate how utilizing helicopters could
speed access for more patients.
The goal of the new
research, Carr says, was to think
differently about how to deliver stroke
care, perhaps by policy solutions such as
allowing ambulances to cross state lines, or
using helicopters to more rapidly transfer
patients to stroke centers.
No national system
for acute care of stroke patients currently
exists, unlike the regionalized system for
transport of trauma patients – those who’ve
had car crashes, suffered falls, or been
stabbed or shot – to hospitals that meet
specific care benchmarks, making it possible
for 83 percent of the U.S. population to
reach trauma care within an hour.
In addition to air
transport of stroke patients to high-level
facilities, the authors suggest that other,
lower-cost solutions could also be employed
to extend the net of optimal care to a
greater number of patients across the
nation.
Among suggestions: the
development of inter-hospital referral
networks, using telemedical technology to
connect smaller or rural hospitals with
guidance from specialty physicians trained
in stroke care, and offering incentives for
the development of stroke centers in
underserved areas.
“Strokes often strike
without warning. We are all at risk, and the
therapy is time-critical. Data like these
brings us closer to taking a big step in the
development of not only a more robust stroke
system, but of an emergency care system that
can serve anyone, no matter where they are
in the country,” Carr says.
“Using technology, we hope
to develop new ways to connect hospitals to
each other so that instead of always
delivering the patient to the doctor, we
will be able to deliver the doctor to the
patient.”
Other authors of the study
include lead author Karen C. Albright, DO,
MPH; Brett C. Meyer, MD; and Justin A. Zivin,
MD, PhD at the University of California San
Diego; Dawn E. Matherne-Meyer, APRN, BC, FNP
at the University of California Los Angeles
School of Nursing; Patrick D. Lyden, MD, at
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; and Charles C.
Branas, PhD, at the University of
Pennsylvania School of Medicine.
Penn Medicine is one of
the world’s leading academic medical
centers, dedicated to the related missions
of medical education, biomedical research,
and excellence in patient care. Penn
Medicine consists of the University of
Pennsylvania School of Medicine (founded in
1765 as the nation's first medical school)
and the University of Pennsylvania Health
System, which together form a $3.6 billion
enterprise.
Penn’s School of Medicine
is currently ranked #3 in U.S. News & World
Report’s survey of research-oriented medical
schools, and is consistently among the
nation’s top recipients of funding from the
National Institutes of Health, with $367.2
million awarded in the 2008 fiscal year.
Penn Medicine’s patient
care facilities include:
• The Hospital of the
University of Pennsylvania – the nation’s
first teaching hospital, recognized as one
of the nation’s top 10 hospitals by U.S.
News & World Report.
• Penn Presbyterian
Medical Center – named one of the top 100
hospitals for cardiovascular care by Thomson
Reuters for six years.
• Pennsylvania Hospital –
the nation’s first hospital, founded in
1751, nationally recognized for excellence
in orthopaedics, obstetrics & gynecology,
and behavioral health.
Additional patient care
facilities and services include Penn
Medicine at Rittenhouse, a Philadelphia
campus offering inpatient rehabilitation and
outpatient care in many specialties; as well
as a primary care provider network; a
faculty practice plan; home care and hospice
services; and several multispecialty
outpatient facilities across the
Philadelphia region.
Penn Medicine is committed
to improving lives and health through a
variety of community-based programs and
activities. In fiscal year 2008, Penn
Medicine provided $282 million to benefit
our community.
... ..
...
...