Now, keep up to date
with daily feeds of newly posted stories
about America's Seniors...click on the box
to the left
Social Smokers: Turning the Tables on Big
Tobacco
Newswise — The tobacco industry knows
exactly what makes social smokers tick. Now,
researchers want to use that once-secret
information to help them quit.
Focusing on the effects of secondhand smoke,
not on personal health, might be a better
tactic with social smokers, who tend to deny
that they are at-risk or even smokers, but
do care about others.
The landmark state litigation against the
tobacco industry — known as the Master
Settlement Agreement — forced tobacco
companies to open confidential industry
documents to the public; so far, they have
released 10 million documents spanning more
than 80 years.
Researchers at the University of California
at San Francisco mined this mother lode of
information, focusing on social smokers.
Their study appears in the August issue of
the American Journal of Preventive Medicine.
“Tobacco companies probably spent hundreds
of millions of dollars for this research,”
said co-author Stanton Glantz, Ph.D., at the
UCSF Center for Tobacco Control Research.
“They indentified this group as a large,
stable part of the tobacco market way before
public health did.”
What else did the cigarette manufacturers
learn?
Part of the social smoker’s self-image is
the belief that they are “in control.” They
restrict themselves, by smoking just on
weekends or at parties, or maybe limiting
the habit to a few cigarettes a day. They
rarely smoke alone and typically do not
smoke around non-smokers. Before they light
up, they ask people if they “mind.”
Most believe they are not addicted to
nicotine and that they are immune to the
health risks — lung cancer, heart disease —
of “real” smokers.
That is wishful thinking, according to study
co-author Rebecca Schane, M.D. “It’s like,
‘you’re not just a little bit pregnant.’
Either you smoke or you don’t. With any
smoking, there’s risk.”
According to the authors, social smoking
rates are on the rise and this group now
makes up more than a quarter of all smokers.
“It’s no surprise that the tobacco industry
is interested in social smokers — they want
everyone who has lungs to smoke,” said
Joseph DiFranza, M.D., a professor at the
University of Massachusetts Medical School.
“They leave no stone unturned.”
However, Schane points out that “Public
health guidelines do not incorporate
treatment for nondaily smokers beyond
‘Advise them to quit.’”
Current smoking cessation programs target
chronic daily smokers and likely would not
work for social smokers, according to the
study authors.
“Standard therapies may not be appropriate
for these people. Social smokers may not be
physically addicted,” Schane said. “They can
go for periods without craving smoking.
Nondaily smokers, who are similar to social
smokers, do better with counseling than
nicotine replacement.”
But, she added, the jury is still out on
what treatment advice to give to clinicians
working with nondaily and social smokers, as
drug studies rarely include those groups.
“[Social] smokers routinely have been
excluded from smoking cessation
interventions for decades, but there’s no
reason to suggest that the same
interventions wouldn’t work for them,”
DiFranza said.
Clinicians should dig deeper, Schane said,
by asking patients about smoking on a daily,
weekly or social basis, rather than as a
yes-no question.
“We need to do a better job of identifying
these smokers,” Glantz said. “The tobacco
companies are.”
... ..
...
...