A
patient's own skin cells may one day treat
multiple diseases
August 10, 2011 — The possibility of
developing stem cells from a patient's own
skin and using them to treat conditions as
diverse as Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's
disease and cancer has generated tremendous
excitement in the stem cell research
community in recent years.
Such therapies would avoid the
controversial need for using stem cells
derived from human embryos, and in theory,
also bypass immunological problems inherent
in using cells from one person to treat
another.
However, in the nearly five years since the
first article describing the development of
stem cells derived from adult cells —
so-called induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs)
— unique problems inherent in their use have
surfaced and even their immunological safety
has been called into question.
According to Paul S. Knoepfler, UC Davis
associate professor of cell biology and
human anatomy, finding such obstacles in
such a new and novel approach is not
surprising and should not dissuade
investigators from actively pursuing this
avenue of research. A roadmap for finding
solutions to the problems identified with
iPSCs, written by Knoepfler and Bonnie
Barrilleaux, a postdoctoral fellow working
in Knoepfler's laboratory, is available
online and will be published in the Aug. 5
issue of the journal Cell Stem Cell. Their
perspective, "Inducing iPSCs to escape the
dish," suggests research strategies to
advance the field more rapidly toward
applications for human diseases.
"iPSCs offer the potential to treat many
diseases as an alternative or adjuvant
therapy to drugs or surgery," said Knoepfler,
who also is a faculty member of the UC Davis
Genome Center and UC Davis Cancer Center.
"Problems that have been identified with
their use likely can be overcome, allowing
iPSCs to jump from the laboratory dish to
patients who could benefit from them."
iPSCs were first produced in 2006 from mouse
cells and in 2007 from human cells. They
have many of the same regenerative
properties as human embryonic stem cells,
but they are derived in a lab from adult
cells, such as skin cells, by inducing or
forcing them to express specific genes that
are normally dormant in that type of cell.
In theory, a person's skin cells could be
induced to make neurons that produce the
neurotransmitter dopamine, for example, and
be delivered to brain regions where it is
lacking in patients with Parkinson's
disease.
Similarly, cells could be induced to
regenerate heart muscle and blood vessels
after a heart attack, or neurons following a
spinal cord injury. Many labs at UC Davis,
including the Knoepfler lab, are producing
and studying human iPSCs.
One advantage cited for iPSCs over stem
cells derived from embryos is that problems
of rejection due to immunological
differences between the donor (the embryo)
and the patient would be eliminated, because
the iPSCs would be derived from each
individual patient.
A recent study using iPSCs in mice found
that tissue rejection may, in fact, occur in
some cases. However, Knoepfler believes that
particular study was conducted in the
context of tumors, which tend to be highly
immunogenic and not be applicable for human
use. While the ability of human iPSCs to
escape immune attention must be investigated
further, Knoepfler says that iPSCs remain an
attractive potential avenue for stem
cell-based medicine, in addition to
embryonic stem cells.
Another concern with using either iPSCs or
embryonic stem cells is that cells with the
ability to turn into many different cell
types may grow out of control, producing
cancerous tumors. Knoepfler points out those
studies involved implanting large numbers of
undifferentiated stem cells into mice that
were treated with immunosuppressant drugs to
reject transplants, making the conditions
ideal for cancers to arise. This scenario,
he argues, is unlikely to be applicable when
treating humans for actual diseases. In such
cases, the stem cells would be induced to
have a specific function, and the body's
natural immune defenses would be present.
The "pluripotent" nature of stem cells,
which potentially allow their use to repair
almost any tissue, is only beginning to be
harnessed for human therapies. Stem cell
therapy has already been successfully used
for years to treat leukemia and related bone
and blood cancers. The use of iPSCs could
vastly increase the spectrum of diseases
that might be treated with stem cells,
without the safety and ethical concerns
inherent in using embryonic stem cells.
"Dr. Barrilleaux and I argue for a shift in
research priorities," said Knoepfler.
"Future studies of iPSCs should increasingly
focus on issues most relevant to the
eventual clinical use of the cells, offering
the fastest pathway to treating patients
with this potentially powerful therapeutic
tool."
Knoepfler's own research focuses on
determining how stem cell behavior is
controlled during normal embryonic
development as well as during healing and
regeneration. He also studies how control
systems go awry in developmental disorders
and cancer. One key direction for the
Knoepfler lab is using leading genomics
technology to better understand why stem
cells behave the way they do and how to
change that behavior for clinical use.
###
Funding for Knoepfler's article was provided
by a grant from the California Institute for
Regenerative Medicine.
ABOUT UC DAVIS STEM CELL RESEARCH
UC Davis has brought together physicians,
research scientists, biomedical engineers
and a range of other experts and
collaborative partners to establish the UC
Davis Institute for Regenerative Cures, a
facility supported by the California
Institute for Regenerative Medicine. The $62
million institute is housed on the
university's Sacramento campus, where
collaborative, team-oriented science is
advancing breakthrough discoveries and
working to bring stem cell therapies and
cures to patients. For more information,
visit
www.ucdmc.ucdavis.edu/stemcellresearch/