|
The older worker...
valued resource or museum piece?
by Daniel Hines
Publisher
America's Seniors/TodaysSeniorsNetwork.com
A fellow I know has two wonderful old cars, 1964 and 1963
Chevrolet Impalas, that he has refinished. They are beautiful
automobiles, wonderful performers and a thrill to drive. But,
in fear of damaging
them, he keeps them
in a garage, taking
them out only for special occasions. When he does drive them, they are the object of admiration and even a bit of awe from those who
see them.
That is somewhat the way it is with older
workers or job applicants. Loaded with style and potential,
they have been garaged,
considered
almost as a museum piece. As a result, each day, literally hundreds..
perhaps
even thousands of employers across the nation violate the
nation's civil rights' laws. How? They discriminate against a resource
that represents one of this
country's biggest losses in terms of skills,
productivity, creativity and just good
business operations by turning
away the older worker.
That such discrimination exists is undeniable. To prove it, however, is
more
difficult, since the illegal
act is cloaked in terminology such as "you are too
qualified...we can't afford someone of your talent
and experience...we have changed our
focus and need someone with less experience and salary requirements...you have a wonderful
background,
but it doesn't fit our needs..."
As a result, the talents of our older citizens
too often are cast aside in favor of lower-cost and
less-experienced employees. Of
course, they deserve their opportunity as well as the older workers, but the chance should
be
based upon competitive factors in which skills and talents are measured not
in terms of
age, but by the ability to get the job done.
There are those employers who will claim that
they need to build their
workforce with younger people, who will be with them much longer
than
an older employee. However, the question of age is becoming
less and
less of a
factor in longevity with a company. There is no guarantee that the
younger employee
will remain with an employer longer than the older worker.
As a matter of fact, the
odds are likely that the
younger worker will move
more frequently as he or she builds a
career.
Also, age is becoming more and more of a
relative factor. Actually, it is highly
likely that the older worker might be in
better shape physically and emotionally
than a younger employee. This is reflected
as the retirement age (if there is
such a thing) creeps upward on the part of employers
and the Social Security Administration.
What then is to be done? The first thing
is the establishment of a proactive program by organizations representing the rights of
aging adults to aggressively
work to ensure that the rights of these workers
are being
protected.
But, this is not enough. There must also
be a proactive communications effort
in which the abilities of aging workers are not only
explained to potential
employers, but in which there is a greater public appreciation of
the contributions
of older employees to our society in terms of the experience and knowledge they
offer. In short--it is time to work to help ensure that older
workers and job applicants
receive public support for their contributions and that they
not merely be regarded as one might view an older automobile that offers design, style,
memories and performance, only to be stored in a garage
until the next time they are
hauled out
for a curious public to view and and admire.
|