Now, keep up to date
with daily feeds of newly posted stories
about America's Seniors...click on the box
to the left
Study suggests 'Hookups' can turn into
Meaningful Relationships
Newswise, August 2010 — Relationships that
start with a spark and not much else aren’t
necessarily doomed from the get-go, new
University of Iowa research suggests.
In an analysis of relationship surveys, UI
sociologist Anthony Paik found that average
relationship quality was higher for
individuals who waited until things were
serious to have sex compared to those who
became sexually involved in "hookups,"
"friends with benefits," or casual dating
relationships.
But having sex early on wasn't to blame for
the disparity. When Paik factored out people
who weren't interested in getting serious,
he found no real difference in relationship
quality. That is, couples who became
sexually involved as friends or
acquaintances and were open to a serious
relationship ended up just as happy as those
who dated and waited.
"We didn't see much evidence that
relationships were lower quality because
they started off as hookups," said Paik, an
assistant professor in the UI College of
Liberal Arts and Sciences.
"The study
suggests that rewarding relationships are
possible for those who delay sex. But it's
also possible for true love to emerge if
things start off with a more 'Sex and the
City' approach, when people spot each other
across the room, become sexually involved
and then build a relationship."
Published this month in the journal Social Science Research, the study analyzed
surveys of 642 heterosexual adults in the
Chicago area. Relationship quality was
measured by asking about the extent to which
each person loved their partner, the
relationship's future, level of satisfaction
with intimacy, and how their lives would be
different if the relationship ended. The
survey also asked when participants became
sexually involved with their partners.
So if not the context of sexual involvement,
what is behind the lower quality scores for
relationships initiated as hookups? Paik
points to selection: Certain people are
prone to finding relationships unrewarding,
and those individuals are more likely to
form hookups.
"The question is whether it's the type of
relationship that causes lower quality or
whether it's the people," he said. "The
finding is that it's something about the
people."
People with higher numbers of past sexual
partners were more likely to form hookups,
and to report lower relationship quality.
Through the acquisition of partners, Paik
said, they begin to favor short-term
relationships and find the long-term ones
less rewarding.
It's also likely that people who are
predisposed to short-term relationships are
screened out of serious ones because they
don't invest the time and energy to develop
long-term ties, Paik said.
The research showed that plenty of people
date even if they aren't interested in a
long-term relationship. It's a bit
surprising, Paik said, since dating falls
under the romance category, while "friends
with benefits" and hookups do not.
"While hookups or friends with benefits can
turn into true love, both parties typically
enter the relationship for sex and the
expectations are fairly low," Paik said. "In
the casual dating category, some people
think they're headed for a long-term
relationship, but there are also people who
are only in it for sex. It basically brings
'players' and 'non-players' together. As a
consequence, it raises the question of
whether casual dating is a useful
institution. This paper would suggest not
really, because it doesn't screen out the
non-romantic types."
In conducting the study, Paik controlled for
several factors known to influence
relationship quality, such as marital
status, children and social embeddedness.
Consistent with prior research, he found
that unmarried couples and those with
children had lower relationship quality, but
couples with positive ties to each other's
relatives had higher relationship quality.
While this study found that nonromantic
sexual relationships can become something
special, they can also be risky. Paik's
earlier studies indicate that people
involved in hookups are more likely to have
concurrent sexual partners, which can
increase the risk of sexually transmitted
diseases.
In a study of Chicago-area adults published
earlier this year, Paik reported that being
involved with a friend increased the
likelihood of non-monogamy by 44 percent for
women and 25 percent for men. Involvement
with an acquaintance or stranger increased
the odds by 30 percent for women and 43
percent for men. For more information on
this research, visithttp://www.news-releases.uiowa.edu/2010/April/040110study-relationships.html.